Important notice: Check out our Skepticism Panel at Gen Con Indy 2009! Four skeptics, two hours, one awesome seminar! Brought to you in association with Tom Foss and Wikinite! Register here!



10 January 2007

A Crackpot in Canada

Wow. I seem to have located some of the most absurd "science" on display in the entire webiverse. Thanks to Something Awful, I clicked on their most recent Awful Link of the Day, and walked right into the mad scientist laboratory of complete fucktard (excuse me, "independent scientist") John Hutchison. Here we see a veritable buffet of nonsense, from which we can pick and choose our meal and eat to our heart's content. It's like going to Pizza Hut at lunchtime, except with less pizza and more crazy.

Though I'm not sure "crazy" is quite the right word. It seems more like "fabrication." But let's begin at the beginning. Here's a few excerpts from the summary on his main page, a fuchsia mess of poorly sized graphics, Harry Potter typesets, and two cyberpenises shooting lightning at each other. All spelling errors are original.

John Hutchison's life changed drastically in 1979 when, upon starting up an array of high-voltage equipment, he felt something hit his shoulder. He threw the piece of metal back to where it seemed to have originated, and it flew up and hit him again. This was how he originally discovered fundamental frequencies can sheild gravity.
Fundamental frequencies can shield gravity? What does this even mean? Why does gravity need shielding? Is it under attack? And what type of high-voltage equipment, I wonder? Power lines? Those cool globe things that send tendrils of purple out to your fingers when you touch them? It's interesting in its vagueness. Remember, folks, when lying, it is better to be specific. Nonspecificity is more easily pegged as a lie. Not that I'm saying that the redoubtable Mr. Hutchison is lying. No. Just that, well, he's lying.
Upon analysis and thorough investigation, the Canadian government dubbed this phenomenon the Hutchison Effect.
I see no evidence for this claim over the rest of the entire website. You think that he would proudly display documentary evidence of such an occurrence somewhere, but no. But then, it's irrelevant anyway, because the Canadian government is not the arbiter of science. New Line Cinema called a movie "The Butterfly Effect," and it didn't have shit to do with chaos theory. But more to the point, a government granting a fancy name to something doesn't make it science. Calling something X doesn't make it X. As Abe Lincoln is thought to have said, "How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg."
What is the Hutchison effect? As with much of the new-energy field, no one can say for sure. Some theorists think the effect is the result of opposing electromagnetic fields cancelling each other out, creating a powerful flow of space energy. The Canadian government also reported invisible samples phasing in and out of existence.
What is the Hutchison effect? Complete bullshit. I don't even want to call it woo, because it's all so transparently intentionally false. "The new-energy field," however, does sound like complete woo. "Space energy?" As they say in Canada, "Eh?" And as you'll see when we get to the pictures and videos, if the Canadian government said any such thing, then Infophile should start a movement for an immediate special election in all districts.
A Vancouver businessman, George Liscazis, heard about the Hutchison Effect in 1987, contacted Hutchison, and brought in a consulting engineer from Boeing Aerospace, and the Canadian government to form a company that would promote technology developed from the effect. Many different political factors ensured Hutchison would not be allowed to continue in his research unless he signed agreements with either the Canadian government or the U.S. military. He refused.
This is followed by a summary of the illegal actions taken by the Canadian government to seize Mr. Hutchison's equipment, which, of course, was totally covered up. The quote itself shows that, of course, it was politics that meant he couldn't do further work. Those pesky Men in Black, always stomping on the little guy. And let's get something straight, something that's been working my last nerve for a while now. Engineers are not scientists. They are engineers. They have the ability, of course, to understand science, but are not educated strictly to do so. Scientists are, and that's why they're called scientists. No offense, scientifically-literate engineers. It's just that engineers love to claim knowledge beyond their purview, and many of them seem extra susceptible to the woo. I matriculated at one of the best colleges for engineering in America, and every last one of my engineer friends had some pet woo, from aura reading to Reiki, because "Trust me, I'm a scientist. It's science." Well, no, it's not and you're not. You're a fucking engineer.
After many more years of experiments, demonstrations and lectures in other countries such as U.S.A. Germany and Japan, Hutchison returned to Vancouver in 1991.
The Time Cube dude lectured, too, and at MIT, no less. Doesn't make him any less of a crackpot.
Under the "Experiments" section, you will find John and friends are still developing new ideas, and historically engineering suppressed and lost technologies for release and scrutiny by the general public. In John's upcomming newsletter, he will be releasing never before seen, previously classified documentation from his own works as well as the Department of Defense documentation he has aquired over the years. from government sources, with or without official authorization.
I love how "Experiments" is in quotes. It accurately describes the work he does (be patient, we'll get there). And here we see the appeal to lost and suppressed technologies. "THEY didn't want you to know about it, but I, John Hutchison, FREEDOM SCIENTIST, will liberate the truth. With or without official authorization."
Please enjoy this independent scientist's website and all it has to offer. John has remained independent regardless of multi million dollar offers to conceal his findings from the general public. N.A.S.A. is among the agencies he has turned down, as well as both the superpowers offerings to privatize and or militarize his inventions. John belives in a world of free energy and the marvels of anti- gravity for the general public, not just those in positions of power. He also remains hopeful his inventions one day will ease the burden and suffering, and enrich all of mankind all around the world, rich or poor.
Whatever, asshole. I'd like to see actual evidence that he's turned down millions of dollars from governments and NASA and who knows who else. All we have from the American government is here: a few letters saying "No, we don't want your shit," and a very long Department of Defense newsletter that doesn't seem to have anything to do with him. The archive of all government contact and documentation boasts an impressive number of "under construction" links. There's also this letter from somebody at NASA who shows what I will call "exceptionally polite skepticism." Once again, though, it must be said that even if the government somehow bought into his crap, that still doesn't mean it's real. Here again the noble Robin Hood of nonscience turns down the rich to give to the poor. And what exactly does he have to give? Here's a few samples.

Photo #1: Aluminum bar jellification
What a phenomenon, jellification. It looks to me like he sculpted something out of gray clay and took a picture.

Photo #2: Jellied metal cylinder
That looks like Play-Doh does when you remove it from its little plastic canister. Coincidence? You be the judge.

Photo #3: Anomalous behavior caused by the Hutchison effect

So the Hutchison effect stacks a bunch of random shit on a table? Ooh, spooky.

Photo #4: Piece of wood morphed into aluminum

Here I must use the classification of Dr. Thorpe, the SA writer who posted the link: what we are seeing here is the "mysterious silver spraypaint effect."

Photo #5: A stainless butterknife moulded into a block of aluminum
I'm not even sure what to do with this. Butterknives aren't even shaped like that. It's like a retarded spoon or something. With spraypaint.

Photo #6: Aluminum anomalies
So, from left to right we have: spraypainted clay, spraypainted wood splintered in the middle, what appears to be a ferrous alloy rather than aluminum, probably found in a junkyard somewhere, and the aforementioned spraypainted pieces of wood. Are we really supposed to take this guy seriously?

Photo #7: Levitation of a disappearing bar of steel

Now this would be useful. Levitating things while making them disappear at the same time? Amazing! Unfortunately, all I see is a reflective block of metal standing on end. Next, we have my absolute favorite out of everything on his site...

Photo #8: John's homemade ray gun, exhibited at Expo '86

"John's movie prop ray gun, admired by Howard Stern in a 1986 metal video on MTV." Seriously, that shit looks like something from the original Dr. Who series. It is the prototypical sci-fi gun, and it doesn't help that it is labeled only "ray gun." What kind of rays does it shoot? You'd think that since the guy built it, he'd be more specific as to its projectile capacity. Instead, we're left with more vagueness and a picture of something straight out of Buck Fucking Rogers. In all the videos on his website, nowhere is there a shot of this "ray gun" shooting "rays." That would be fantastic evidence that he isn't a complete crackpot, and very simple to do, unless, of course, the gun shoots "video erasing rays."

Speaking of movies, it's time we take a look at a few of his clips of "anomalous activity." These are fantastic. Following each link will be commentary containing a likely explanation for what magical new-energy science most likely caused the observed effect. And maybe some ridicule. (Warning: he can't be bothered to post actual video files, so you'll need Flash to watch most of his files.)

Video #1: Portal phenomenon caused by the Hutchison Effect
Flashlight on a wall. Video overexposed to exacerbate the "mystery."

Video #2: Levitation of an empty 2L bottle caused by the Hutchison Effect.

Fishing line. I mean, seriously, this looks worse than the "special effects" in 50s movies. And now, somehow, we've mad the leap from metal to synthetic polymers. Why, I wonder, did it have to be an empty 2-liter bottle? Are the full ones too hard to lift with your fishing line?

Video #3: Aluminum jellification caused by the Hutchison effect

Nothing special here, really. A static bent rod of something-or-other lying on a table. How did he create it? Oh, I don't know, say he bent it? I'd like to see jellification in action rather than just a bunch of still shots. Sadly, I doubt that will ever happen, see, because this man is full of shit.

Video #4: Anomalous behavior caused by the Hutchison effect
A bowl filled with viscous liquid is attached upside-down to a piece of plywood. The camera is then turned upside-down to make it look like the substance is levitating when, in fact, it is falling.

Video #5: More classic Hutchison effect footage
What we have here is a pixelated mess that makes me think he really is just a heavy metal music video producer. It's mostly fishing line work, but there's an interesting bit where he causes a plastic milk jug to "collapse," probably by sucking air out through a hole in its stationary bottom.

Video #6: Very first footage of the Hutchison effect. The samples phase in and out of existence

Ooh, this one's in Quicktime! Try as I might, I do not see any "phasing" whatsoever. Of course, given that "phase" is really rather an ill-defined verb, I might just be looking for the wrong thing. What I see is a piece of metal (the same shiny thing from photo #7, it seems) being controlled by a magnet on the other side of that piece of wood.

Notice how, except in the fishing line work, the shots are very close-up with no real periphery, so we don't get to see the intricate workings of his home-brewed 1952-era special effects studio. It's not necessary in the fishing-line work, because he's banking on his poor resolution camerawork to obfuscate its existence from a wide shot. Also on this page are clips from some show on TechTV (that's a reliable source) as well as a couple of shows about Zero Point Energy, almost always a tip-off to bullshit. Other tip-offs include his constant use of the word "Tesla," like the whackjobs I fisked last year, mentions of crystals and the Bermuda Triangle, correspondence with Hal Puthoff, one of the Ganzfeld experimenters, and a link to "Coast to Coast AM" in his "Friends" section.

Other things on the site include a giant, presumably unpublished article in PDF format, a couple of spectrograph readings that mean precisely dick to the layman (but look scientific and are thus impressive to him), and a whole page of completely irrelevant scans of letters and documents from "alternative science" fairs. I mean, the guy's been working on this shit for almost 30 years. You'd think that, if the Hutchison effect were real, he'd have incontrovertible proof and real scientists would have beat a path to his door in excitement. After all, he levitated and morphed and phased objects with stuff that cost him a normal person's salary and not a military budget. But no, not even one article in a real journal, and not a single video or picture that can't be explained with $10 worth of stuff from the Wal-Mart down the street.

Basically, there's nothing whatsoever to convince me, you, or anyone else that this guy is anything but a nut with a camera and some string. The sheer obviousness of the falseness of his claims leads me to believe that he isn't even trying to be truthful, just grab a little fame for himself among other nuts. This is some of the worst, most transparent nonsense I think I've ever seen. 30 years of wasted time. Countless hours spent to fill a badly-constructed website with pointless nonsense, none of which proves his ridiculous conjectures. I hope he's getting something out of it. I imagine that "the Hutchison effect" is, in reality, John Hutchison's ability to get off while thinking of all the creduloids who fall for his garbage. Apparently, to counter the Hutchison effect, all you need is a couple pieces of Kleenex.

20 comments:

Bronze Dog said...

Stuff like this is one reason I try to avoid setting hypothetical upper bounds to stupidity.

EoR said...

"invisible samples phasing in and out of existence"? I want proof! How about a BEFORE photo (no invisible object present) and an AFTER photo (invisible object present - but not visible)?

Since there are thousands of people actively promoting "suppressed" technology, how is it "suppressed"? And where's my magic flying car?

Akusai said...

Well, that depends. How far are you willing to go for The Flying Car?

keith said...

You lot probably think like the other monkey mentality that the earth was flat.
Gravity is a pushing force from space not a pulling force from mass. Even physicists call it the God constant as they don't know what causes gravity and have made up a particle called the graviton.
open your minds, we only have technology that can show a small spot of light in a dark room; time will allow us to flick the switch and realise the true nature of that which is all around us. It is all about zero point energy, google it!!!!!!!!
www_splashplay_co_uk

Akusai said...

Wow...What a huge mess of complete nonsense.

Let me just say this: even if anything you said was true (which it isn't; in fact, I can't even parse half of it), it still wouldn't mean that John Hutchison is anything more than a worthless nutjob.

Thanks for trying, though.

Rockstar Ryan said...

You lot probably think like the other monkey mentality that the earth was flat.

So this dipshit

1. Thinks that we think we evolved from monkeys.

and

2. That people who don't think we were made from dust by a magical man in the sky think Earth is flat.

Even physicists call it the God constant as they don't know what causes gravity and have made up a particle called the graviton.

Can you name more than one? That truly was the most made-up bunch of bullshit I've ever seen...today.

Rockstar Ryan said...

But then I went and checked my e-mail.

Replicant said...

I've seen Hutchison before, back when Michael Shermer had a prime-time TV show about debunking garbage just like this. When Shermer's crew tried to make appointments to investigate and for first-hand demonstrations, he kept procrastinating, and never did produce.

He's a friggin' crackpot, but is now showing up on Discovery and Science Channel shows.

In fact I'm watching some Science channel show right now showcasing Hutchison. One of the people they have to "validate" the ideas is a guy who "taught people in the US Army to bend metal with their minds". With their heads, more like, as in hitting themselves with lead pipes.

Science channel really should be ashamed of themselves for giving this moron any airtime.

James Randi would have a field day with this idiot.

Shon said...

fwdI think that you all seem to be simply avoiding showing any real reason to this being fake and are just filling this page with foul language (that really does not help your case but does a good job of making you all look juvenile). I am not saying that the experiments he is doing are real on not but if you are trying to say other people who might be open to this type of thing are un educated and so forth then it looks like you all are clearly in the same boat. Or at least that is how you have portrayed yourselves.
I alway enjoy hearing the so called "Sceptics" skate beautifully around the issue with useless banter like movie tags and "I need to see it before I believe it", etc. while never actually saying much about what they are trying to "de-bunk" except for things like swamp gas and excess flairs. Is that really the best you can come up with?
The B2 Stealth Bomber was in existance since the early 80's yet I am sure that "Sceptics" back then were just as fast to say that such a thing could never have existed (along with the US Government, we all know they can be trusted for thier word) and then in 1990 the whole world saw it. Want proof? Want to see it for yourself? Do some research, this is a great way to back up what you are saying instead of just bashing others who have already done so. If he was a "Crackpot" then why did the local RCMP and Government raid his home and sieze equipment not once but twice? And if it does not work then why have they not retuned it after a Supreme Court Judge ruled that they should?
Can you see air? I thought not.
De-bunk this....(used four dots so I must be full if sh*t).

Akusai said...

Actually, I gave plenty of reasons why it was bullshit; one after each photo and video. No skating around the issue here.

And besides, what you seem to want to call "skating around the issue" is in actuality "demanding proof." Do not shift the burden of proof. Of course, then you go on to say:

Do some research, this is a great way to back up what you are saying instead of just bashing others who have already done so.

Hutchison has done no research. "Mad scientist shit in your basement" is not research. "Building a 'ray gun'" is not research. If he wants people to believe him, he should put solid, real research into peer-reviewed scientific literature instead of putting up a shitty website complaining about government conspiracies.

The B2 Stealth Bomber was in existance since the early 80's yet I am sure that "Sceptics" back then were just as fast to say that such a thing could never have existed

No skeptic ever would have said that. Lacking evidence, a skeptic might have said, tentatively, "There is no evidence for such an aircraft, therefore I do not believe one exists." Changing your views when new evidence comes to light is not, as you seem to think, a bad thing. You demonstrate quite clearly here that you understand nothing about skepticism or the scientific method.

If he was a "Crackpot" then why did the local RCMP and Government raid his home and sieze equipment not once but twice?

Non sequitur. I pointed out in the post, you fucking tool, that government interest does legitimate science make. The American Federal Government raided the Jonestown complex; does that mean they were legitimate?

And if it does not work then why have they not retuned it after a Supreme Court Judge ruled that they should?

Another non-sequitur. Just because they still have it doesn't mean it works. The TSA seized my screwdriver and needle-nosed pliers when I flew to San Francisco in '05; that they still have them is evidence of nothing, Supreme Court justice or not. You really don't get this whole "evidence" thing very well, do you?

Can you see air?

No, but I can feel it, utilize it in my body's metabolism, track it with instruments, use it in experiments, test it, and predict its properties based on certain observations and calculations. When other people all around the world do this over and over again, it lends credence to my observations and makes it more and more likely that I'm not delusional. The only one limited to his own to eyes is you, dipshit.

De-bunk this....(used four dots so I must be full if sh*t).

I believe I just have....(and no, you're full of shit because you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. Now kindly go fuck a dog, douchebag.)

Shon said...

What a waste of time, fighting in the sand box and name calling.
"Mad scientist shit in your basement" is not research
I guess that Bill gates never di research either then huh?
"Apple was founded on April 1, 1976 by Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and Ronald Wayne[10] (and later incorporated January 3, 1977[3] without Wayne, who sold his share of the company back to Jobs and Wozniak) to sell the Apple I personal computer kit. They were hand-built by Steve Wozniak[11][12] in the living room of Jobs' parents' home"
Guess that means these guys were doing "Mad scientist shit in your basement" there must have been no research done there either huh?
I guess the same goes for Leonardo de Vinci as well then and so on.
"Actually, I gave plenty of reasons why it was bullshit; one after each photo and video. No skating around the issue here."
Right I forgot becuase it it is so obvious that the mteal that was pulled apart was just some piece of wood that was painted. Have you ever seen splinters that look like that? Really, ask yourself now.
Again I am not saying the John had anything to do with that piece of metal or whatever it is but I am saying the for sure it is not a painted piece of wood.
I have an open mind, open to the chance that it may or may not be real, but perhaps possible.
What I dont have an open mind to is a group who think of themselves as authoritative in regards to what they are talking about and then offer such rediculous explenations just so they can have a bit of lime light. And again the foul language and imaturaty ads so much credibility to your side I can hardly bear it. I give up you are right, everything is as you say and nothing else is possible unless you say it is. You seem so well informed and intelligent.
Hope you are not writing your responces from your basement because we all know what that would mean.
"Non sequitur. I pointed out in the post, you fucking tool, that government interest does legitimate science make. The American Federal Government raided the Jonestown complex; does that mean they were legitimate?"
Again changing the subject or skating around it so you dont have to address the real issue.
Always chewing a bit of fat but not getting to the meat where you really find out what you are bitting into.
"a skeptic might have said, tentatively, "There is no evidence for such an aircraft, therefore I do not believe one exists"
My point exactly. B
But it did.
Thank you for "de-bunking" skeptics around the globe.

Akusai said...

Oh boy, Mr. I Can't Spell or Use Proper Punctuation, you've got me. I concede. I've just been screaming cuss words and skating around the issue...By directly engaging your arguments and pointing out where they are faulty.

Do you seriously think there is some correlation to government seizure and legitimacy? Are you that fucking brain-dead?

Whining about closed-minded meanies will not get you anywhere.

Look up some David Hume: what's more likely, that some dude is making fraudulent videos in his basement or that some dude has proven all known laws of physics wrong in his basement?

If you pick the latter, you lose. Kindly walk yourself off a cliff.

Bronze Dog said...

Another believer in the godhood of The State.

Just because the government believes something to be true doesn't mean it is. The government is filled to the brim with idiots who can't even agree on having science be taught in science classes.

Of course, since you bring up Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, they produced products that work, and are available to anyone who can confirm that they work.

Basement pseudoscientists have a habit of never engaging in the scientific method: They won't let anyone verify, and they typically won't let anyone engage in serious examination.

Shon said...

Funny I dont remeber ever talking about the Goverment being right.
This site deserves no further attention, and no it is not because I am running away as I am sure you would say something like that. You are just a waste of bandwidth and time.
Again not saying that the Hutchison Effect is real or not and never did.
In conclusion I give the meaing of Skeptic as given from
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/
skep·tic also scep·tic (skptk)
n.
1. One who instinctively or habitually doubts, questions, or disagrees with assertions or generally accepted conclusions.

Have fun with your little club while the world around you changes dispite your opinions.

Bronze Dog said...

Funny I dont remeber ever talking about the Goverment being right.

Well, it certainly came across that way: You never seemed to give any thought to government seizure being the result of government stupidity, and thus not being a sign of legitimacy.

In conclusion I give the meaing of Skeptic as given from
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/...


Oh, yes, conveniently use a dictionary to define our views according to your propagandized straw men, rather than what we actually say.

Have fun with your little club while the world around you changes dispite your opinions.

The hypocrisy is so thick I need one of those ridiculously oversized anime Zanbatous to cut through it. If you had bothered paying attention to the actual people you're arguing with, you'd notice what we're accusing pseudoscientists like this guy of is sloth: If you're too lazy to use the scientific method, you aren't learning anything.

It's the real scientists who act with the diligence of skepticism who are changing the world while the rest of you are willing to maintain the status quo by doing nothing but claiming a revolution's around the corner because you encountered something weird that isn't really all that weird. About the most I expect the Hutchinson effect to be is powerful magnetism. Don't think he'll be letting in gauss meters and such.

(You do realize that non-metallic objects are affected by magnetism, right? How do you think they levitate frogs and strawberries with powerful magnets? Living things are slightly diamagnetic, meaning they're repelled by magnetic fields.)

Lazy asses.

Akusai said...

Having just returned from a performance of Macbeth, I feel the need to refer to Shon's inane babble thusly:

"It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."

I don't think we're even speaking the same language as that assmat.

Lifewish said...

I guess that Bill gates never di research either then huh?

No he didn't. He designed a programming language. That's not research unless your area of expertise is compiler design (and believe me, that wasn't true for Bill...)

What you don't seem to get is that we have quite a high standard for what constitutes research. Creating apparently-very-fake home videos does not qualify.

The reason why our standard is so high is because otherwise we'd end up "discovering" things that don't exist. Heck, even with this high standard, stuff still slips through the net (e.g. cold fusion). If we relaxed our standard too much, there'd be almost nothing we couldn't "prove" to be real.

That's a bad situation to be in because, if we believed in everything, we might as well believe in nothing - our "knowledge" would still provide us with no basis for choosing the correct course of action.

So, to convince us, this guy would need to show us some real research. For example, he could either

1) publish sufficient information that we could reproduce the experimental setup; or

2) demonstrate the alleged effect under controlled conditions (e.g. by applying for the Randi prize) to rule out fraud or delusion as possibilities.

The fact that he has chosen a less evidence-based method of "proof", and that he uses words and concepts ("space energy") that have traditionally been used only by cranks, strongly suggests that he's talking out of his ass.

Bronze Dog said...

You said it pretty well, Lifewish. The lack of rigor is the kind of status-quo maintenance I'm talking about.

Woos typically end up having their "knowledge" arranged in such a way that there's a brick wall set against further research: They snap at us when we ask for more detail, or they describe things in such a way to claim that experiments can't be reproduced and verified by other people.

In short, woos talk big about how their "research" is going to change the world, but never seem to come up with predictions or practical applications. It's a culture of boring gimmicks we have a tendency to already have reproducible explanations for.

That's why woo is so boring most of the time.

Oh, and thanks, Lifewish, for quickly pointing out the difference between invention and research. Was having difficulty finding the right phrases myself.

buy wow gold said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
King of Ferrets said...

I still don't see what the flying fuck the point is to trying to conceal spam like that.